Amebelodon Amebelodon
Amebelodon
Amebelodon

Amebelodon

Amebelodon (†Amebelodon (Barbour, 1927))
 
Order: Proboscidea
Family: Amebelodontidae
nsions: length - 3 m, height - 2,5 m, weight - 1 000-2 500 kg
Expansion: during the Miocene Epoch, about 9-6 million years ago (North America)
A typical representative: Amebelodon fricki 
 
 
Amebelodon is a genus of extinct proboscidean belonging to Amebelodontidae, a group of proboscideans related to the modern elephants and their close relative the mammoth. The most striking attribute of this animal is its lower tusks, which are narrow, elongated, and distinctly flattened with the degree of flattening varying among the different species. Two valid species are currently placed within this genus, which was endemic to North America.
Amebelodon first appeared in the Great Plains and Gulf Coast regions of North America during the late Miocene, roughly 9 million years ago, and apparently became extinct on this continent sometime around 6 million years ago. The youngest record of Amebelodon is from a 5-million-year-old site in North America. The species Amebelodon floridanus was relatively small, a little smaller than living elephants, and was common in fossil sites from 9 to 8 million years ago. Other larger but somewhat younger common North American species include Amebelodon fricki. 
Like other typical gomphotheres, Amebelodon possessed two sets of tusks, one upper set, (much like those found on modern elephants), and one lower set that extended from the very front of the lower jaws. However, as mentioned above, the lower tusks of the Amebelodon were distinctive in that they were relatively long, slender, and flattened. Because of the resemblance of these lower tusks to shovels, Amebelodon is commonly referred to as a "shovel-tusked" gomphothere (another shovel-tusked gomphothere that may or may not be closely related to Amebelodon is Platybelodon). There has long been an assumption that these lower tusks were actually used as shovels by the animal during feeding, presumably to dig up water plants. However, an analysis of wear patterns has shown that these lower tusks were most likely used in a variety of ways in addition to shoveling, including scraping bark from trees. Overall, the evidence indicates that this animal was a versatile browser (an animal that eats broad-leaved plants rather than grass), feeding in both wet and dry settings in a variety of ways. For reasons that are not clearly explained in the literature, Amebelodon is usually portrayed with a short, flap-like trunk (this is true of the associated picture). However, considerable evidence indicates that Amebelodon actually had a long, flexible trunk very much like that found in modern elephants, and that it probably was important for feeding and drinking.
1
2
Оплата
У Вас є кілька зручних способів купівлі зображення: кредитна чи дебетова картка Visa, Mastercard, Maestro; PayPal або банківський переказ
Amebelodon (†Amebelodon (Barbour, 1927))
 
Order: Proboscidea
Family: Amebelodontidae
nsions: length - 3 m, height - 2,5 m, weight - 1 000-2 500 kg
Expansion: during the Miocene Epoch, about 9-6 million years ago (North America)
A typical representative: Amebelodon fricki 
 
 
Amebelodon is a genus of extinct proboscidean belonging to Amebelodontidae, a group of proboscideans related to the modern elephants and their close relative the mammoth. The most striking attribute of this animal is its lower tusks, which are narrow, elongated, and distinctly flattened with the degree of flattening varying among the different species. Two valid species are currently placed within this genus, which was endemic to North America.
Amebelodon first appeared in the Great Plains and Gulf Coast regions of North America during the late Miocene, roughly 9 million years ago, and apparently became extinct on this continent sometime around 6 million years ago. The youngest record of Amebelodon is from a 5-million-year-old site in North America. The species Amebelodon floridanus was relatively small, a little smaller than living elephants, and was common in fossil sites from 9 to 8 million years ago. Other larger but somewhat younger common North American species include Amebelodon fricki. 
Like other typical gomphotheres, Amebelodon possessed two sets of tusks, one upper set, (much like those found on modern elephants), and one lower set that extended from the very front of the lower jaws. However, as mentioned above, the lower tusks of the Amebelodon were distinctive in that they were relatively long, slender, and flattened. Because of the resemblance of these lower tusks to shovels, Amebelodon is commonly referred to as a "shovel-tusked" gomphothere (another shovel-tusked gomphothere that may or may not be closely related to Amebelodon is Platybelodon). There has long been an assumption that these lower tusks were actually used as shovels by the animal during feeding, presumably to dig up water plants. However, an analysis of wear patterns has shown that these lower tusks were most likely used in a variety of ways in addition to shoveling, including scraping bark from trees. Overall, the evidence indicates that this animal was a versatile browser (an animal that eats broad-leaved plants rather than grass), feeding in both wet and dry settings in a variety of ways. For reasons that are not clearly explained in the literature, Amebelodon is usually portrayed with a short, flap-like trunk (this is true of the associated picture). However, considerable evidence indicates that Amebelodon actually had a long, flexible trunk very much like that found in modern elephants, and that it probably was important for feeding and drinking.
Відгуки (10):
Митрич
13.12.2021
Ром - ШЕДЕВР высшей пробы!!! Вероятнее всего именно такая структура.... Изящнее чем у платибелодона, возможно больше ей пользовался как хоботом именно на слоновий манер, сгребая в охапку всякие водные кувшинки-лотосы, массу роголистников или прибрежных тростников, а у платибелодона была просто "крышка" закрывающая ротовую полость..SUPER/... А тот, первый вариант - как колбаса на подносе....
rom
07.12.2021
Судя по черепу, хобот был довольно узким. Не крышка от люка явно.
Митрич
03.12.2021
Ну сам посуди - наличие столь развитого хобота никак не привело бы к функционированию столь гипертрофированной расплющенной нижней челюсти.... Эволюция бы щла по типично "мастодонтному" или "слоновьему" пути с нормальной укороченной челюстью....
Митрич
03.12.2021
Ром, я не знаток, но физически или био-физически по-моему ЭТО химера: не может столь сформированный гибкий слоновий хобот вязаться с лопатообразной челюстью..... Если бы предъявили труп во плоти - тогда бы поверил.... "Башмак" у него должен быть, а не "хобот!"!!
Митрич
15.07.2021
Ром, а если бы ты исторические реконструкции делал? Ну типо як Святослав хазар нагнул или там еще чо про славян...Вообще бы глаз не оторвать....